The centralist decentralization of Peru: between crisis and development 1970-2014

Peruvian centralism extends social and economic inequalities and the urban and regional disparities as well as increases the income disproportions compared to other countries. It is also important to note that the development model and type of centralist state in the twentieth century have seriously impacted the disintegration, inequality, and migration from the provinces. Also, the rural social movements, migration of young people, and accelerated aging of its population contributed to the dislocation and impoverishment of the provinces. The lack of a modern political class and regional, national, and decentralist inspiration has made that the Peruvian development consolidates mostly in the axis of the coast of the country and particularly in Lima.
The dimensions of centralism are economic, demographic, territorial, ethnic-linguistic, and social-political. Is not possible to understand the development process without considering the natural and historical territorial spaces that are concerned and how caring and exploit these spaces that watersheds. One of the fundamental aspects of national development is the existence of a modern, democratic, decentralized state with a political class with legitimacy.


Miranda, F. (2015). La descentralización centralista en el Perú: entre la crisis y el crecimiento 1970-2014. [The centralist decentralization of Peru: between crisis and development 1970-2014].  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JO25i4odxyOtryHOw7teljxu5Rs2Trmw/view?usp=sharing

Entradas populares de este blog

Peru on the Brink of Poverty

Centralization and how it affects education in our Country

Poverty and Centralization in Ayacucho, Puno & Cajamarca